Yeah, Well, I Quit.

Brazil Priest Excommunicated For Defending Gay Rights

Father Roberto Francisco “Padre Beto” Daniel,
sporting a casual look for off-duty soul winning

RIO DE JANEIRO, April 30 (Reuters) – The Catholic Church has excommunicated a Brazilian priest after he defended homosexuality, open marriage and other practices counter to Church teaching in online videos.

In a statement released late on Monday, the priest’s diocese said Father Roberto Francisco Daniel, known to local parishioners as Padre Beto, had “in the name of ‘freedom of expression’ betrayed the promise of fealty to the Church.”

I can’t really say this is surprising.  Defending homosexuality is one thing given the direction public opinion has been moving, even in predominately Catholic parts of the world like Central and South America.  But to go so far as to imply approval for open marriages, well … that’s a paddlin’.  He might have expected something like this to come his way eventually.

In one of the recent videos he posted on and his own Website, the priest said a married person who chose to have an affair, heterosexual or otherwise, would not be unfaithful as long as that person’s spouse allowed it. “If someone is in an extramarital relationship and that relationship is accepted by the spouse, then faithfulness still exists there,” he said.

I don’t know; personally I think this makes moral sense.  If there exists among any number of consenting adults some kind of sexual relationship – and all parties are thoroughly informed and willing participants – then I don’t see a problem.  It’s not my business, and it doesn’t hurt anyone, so have a blast.  Just, y’know, stay safe and everything.

Though I keep getting the nagging suspicion that stuff like that always looks better either in erotic literature or in the mind’s eye.  Your mileage may vary.

This story brings to mind the larger issue of the Catholic Church pushing back against either groups or individuals who refuse to toe the party line – or just don’t toe it enough.  Take, for example, the issue the Church took last year with the group representing the 55,000 nuns in this country.  The Vatican had no objection to their helping the poor or ministering to the sick; however they felt that there wasn’t enough focus on condemning secular society’s increasing allowances on moral issues like homosexuality and reproductive rights.  I mean, come on, girls … get your priorities in order.

In the long run, maybe this is a good thing. The more the church excommunicates, censures, and rejects those within their fold who disagree with them on human sexuality, morality, and other secular issues when they come into conflict with traditional Catholic teachings, the more insular and obsolete they’ll become.  People will still be good, and they’ll consider themselves “Christian”, but that will likely take on a different meaning depending on the person.  My guess is that if the Vatican refuses to grow and adapt to the modernization of society (and what we’ve come to understand about human sexuality and psychology during the last century alone), within the span of a generation their membership will fall precipitously as they become obsessed with purging their ranks of anyone who doesn’t view the world through the lens of their long line of predecessors.

This entry was posted in Freedom from Religion, Religion in the News, Society Marches On and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Yeah, Well, I Quit.

  1. dam says:

    Hi Senator. So I guess we have a new prospect for our (dark) side then in Padre Beto?
    As to your comment here: ” Vatican had no objection to their helping the poor or ministering to the sick; however they felt that there wasn’t enough focus on condemning secular society’s increasing allowances on moral issues like homosexuality and reproductive rights.” Funny how they want to “clean up” society when they can’t even clean up themselves…

    • I have to admit, his style is pretty hip. As for the church as a whole, the greatest scam that religion has managed to pull is convincing the world that you need it to be good. Now, more than any other time in history, I think people are beginning to realize that it’s more of an obstacle to it than anything else. If they remain as obsessed with “cleaning up” their order, they’ll have very few members in about 25 years or so. Maybe the best thing we as atheists can do is just sit tight and let religious institutions dig their own graves.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s